Eco Agro Services
Call WhatsApp
  • Login
  • Sign Up
@
Forgot Password?
@

Request Callback

Uptake, removal, storage & seasonal nutrient requirement by Thompson table grapes in Maharashtra

10 October 2026 7 min read

TablegrapesgrowninMaharashtrahavetwo pruningbutonefruityieldperannum.

Article No. 41 Mr.RavindraThatte

Pruningdone aroundApril is foundation pruning,followed by fruit pruningaroundOctober. Generally, thereis 20 to 40 days post-harvest stage before the foundation pruning of next year.

Knowing annualuptakeof nutrientsas pergrowthstages is veryimportant in developing fertilizer program.Partitioning ofNutrienttovariousorgansandhownutrientsarestoredintheplantisalso veryusefulinformation forgoodIntegrated Nutrient management (INM). Knowing the removal from the field is fundamental to a good fertilisation programme.

It must be noted that uptake of nutrientsdoesnot directly correspond with fertilizer requirement,because: Some of the Nutrient:

•comesfromsoilmineralisation,

•comesfromorganicmatter,

•is remobilisedfromperennialwoodandroots,

•isrecycledfromfallenleaves,

•remainsinshoots/canes,

•comesfromirrigationwater,

•andsomeisreturnedto thesoilthroughpruningresidues.

It must also benoted thatearly growth initially dependspartly on remobilisation frompermanent structuresbecause root uptake does not immediately match shoot demand.

Scientificpublished data for uptakeofplant nutrients for Thompsonseedlessgiving25 ton /Ha (10ton/acre)yieldis available(Wasnik&Bhargava).ManyfarmersinMaharashtraareachievingyieldof15ton/acre(37ton/Ha).Wehave

scaledup thisinformationforyieldof15 ton /acreper annum to showuptakeof variousnutrients as perseason and there utilisation by various plant organs.

15t/acreofgrapesdoesNOTmean15t/acreofplantdry matter.

Asper NRCGrapesPune,Thompson Seedlessbuncheshad approximately 24.42%dry matter,whileshootshad approximately 40.17%, leaves/petioles considerably less, and permanent tissues much higher.

Therefore:

15000 kgfresh grapes×24.42% = ≈3663 kgdrymatterinharvested grapes =3.66 tdrymatter/acre. Total vine biomass is much larger

A Thompson Seedlessstudymeasured approximately 13.1kgdrybiomasspervine,with about43%below ground at the assessment point.

Maharashtra Thompson Seedlessresearch alsodemonstratessubstantialdry-matter storage in trunk,cordons,canes and roots, and confirms that rootstock has a significant influence on dry-matter distribution.

Therefore, for a 15 t/acre Maharashtra vineyard a working biomass estimate is as follows( It is again emphasised thatthe informationpresented below isnotbasedonactualmeasuredreplicated studies,but based on models usingavailable data ) :

Approximateannualbiomassbudget

Biomasspool

Workingrange

Harvestedgrapefreshweight

15t/acre

Harvestedgrapedrymatter

~3.66t/acre

Annualleaves

~0.8–1.6t DM/acre

Annualshoots/canes

~1.21–2.42tDM/acre

New/reallocatedperennialbiomass

~0.40–1.4t DM/acre

Rootgrowth/replacement

~0.8– 1.6tDM/acre

Approximatetotalannualbiomass production

~6.87–10.52tDM/acre

For the15t/acreThompsonSeedlessvineyardinMaharashtra underthe double-pruningsystem. Table : 1 Foundation Pruning cycle

PhysiologyStagewiseutilisationofNutrientsbyThompsonseedless@15tons/acre

Peracre

DAP from foundation pruning

Physiologicalstage

N

kg

P

kg

K

kg

Ca kg

Mg kg

S

kg

Fe g

Mn g

Zn g

B

g

Cu g

0–15

Budburst/initialshoot

growth

3.0

0.5

2.0

2.0

0.5

0.4

25

15

8

8

3

16–30

Earlyshootgrowth

5.0

0.8

4.0

3.0

0.8

0.7

40

25

12

12

5

31–45

Rapidvegetativegrowth

8.0

1.4

7.0

5.0

1.2

1.1

65

40

20

18

7

46–60

Canopyexpansion

10.0

1.7

9.0

6.5

1.5

1.4

80

50

25

22

9

61–75

Mature shoot /leaf development

8.0

1.4

8.0

6.5

1.6

1.2

70

45

22

20

8

76–90

Shootmaturation/storage

5.0

0.9

5.0

5.0

1.2

0.8

45

30

15

14

5

91–105

Pre-fruitpruning

3.0

0.5

3.0

3.5

0.8

0.5

25

18

9

9

3

Foundation

-cycletotal

42.0

7.2

38.0

31.5

7.6

6.1

350

223

111

103

40

Whatishappeninghere?

Thefoundationpruningisprincipallya biomass-buildingandreserve-buildingphase. AsubstantialamountofN,Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn and Zn is going into leaves and shoots rather than into marketable fruit.

Table2—Fruit-pruningcycle

PhysiologyStagewiseutilisationofNutrientsbyThompsonseedless@15tons/acre

Peracre

DAP from fruit pruning

Stage

N

kg

P

kg

K

kg

Ca kg

Mg kg

S

kg

Fe g

Mn g

Zn g

B

g

Cu g

0–15

Bud burst / rapid shoot initiation

3.5

0.6

3.0

2.0

0.6

0.5

25

15

8

8

3

16–30

Shoot elongation / inflorescence development

7.0

1.1

6.0

3.5

0.9

0.9

45

28

15

16

5

31–45

Pre-bloom/flowering

9.0

1.5

8.0

5.0

1.1

1.2

55

35

18

25

7

46–60

Fruitset/berryinitiation

11.0

1.8

11.0

6.5

1.4

1.4

65

40

22

32

8

61–75

Berryexpansion

14.0

2.3

15.0

7.5

1.8

1.7

80

48

27

38

10

76–90

Rapidberrygrowth/veraison

13.0

2.2

16.0

7.0

1.8

1.6

75

45

26

35

10

91–105

Veraison/ripening

10.0

1.7

12.0

5.5

1.4

1.2

55

32

19

25

7

106–120

Finalripening/harvest

5.0

0.9

6.0

3.0

0.8

0.7

30

20

11

15

4

Fruit-cycle

total

72.5

12.1

77.0

40.0

9.8

9.2

430

263

146

194

54

Thisistheeconomicallymostimportantnutrient-partitioning period.

Thistableshowsanimportantpoint Kbecomesdisproportionatelyimportantafterfruitset

ThepublishedseasonalgrapevineresearchconfirmsthatKuptakebecomesparticularlyimportantduringfruit development, while Ca has strong uptake during fruit development/maturation.

Table3—Post-harvestrecoveryandreservereplenishment

PhysiologyStagewiseutilisationofNutrientsbyThompsonseedless@15tons/acre

Per/acre

Days after harvest

Physiologicalphase

N

kg

P

kg

K

kg

Ca kg

Mg kg

S

kg

Fe g

Mn g

Zn g

B

g

Cu g

0–10

Harvestrecovery

3.0

0.5

2.0

3.0

0.6

0.4

20

12

6

7

2

11–20

Activepost-harvestleaves

4.0

0.7

2.5

4.0

0.8

0.5

30

18

8

9

3

21–30

Reserveaccumulation

4.0

0.7

3.0

4.5

0.9

0.6

35

20

10

10

3

31–45

Reserve storage / cane maturation

4.0

0.7

3.0

4.5

0.9

0.6

35

20

10

10

3

46–60

Senescence/recycling

2.0

0.4

1.7

4.2

0.8

0.4

20

12

6

7

2

Post-harvest total

17.0

3.0

12.2

20.2

4.0

2.5

140

82

40

43

13

Note:PostharvestNuptake isdependentonsoil type,vinevigour,climate,rootstock,cropload,lengthof post-harvest period & hence should not be taken as constant.

Thisis the partthat is often missed inannual nutrient calculations.For aMaharashtradouble-prunedvineyard,the cropcycle is notfinishedat harvest.Thevinecontinuestoassimilateandredistributenutrientsintoperennialorgansand reserves

Table4—Consolidatedannualbiological uptake

Addingthethreephasesgivesapproximately:%of nutrientsfoundinvariousorgansofplantbasedonthe3stages

Nutrient

Foundation

Fruitcycle

Post-harvest

Annualuptake

N

42.0

72.5

17.0

131.5kg/acre

P

7.2

12.1

3.0

22.3kg/acre

K

38.0

77.0

12.2

127.2kg/acre

Ca

31.5

40.0

20.2

91.7kg/acre

Mg

7.6

9.8

4.0

21.4kg/acre

S

6.1

9.2

2.5

17.8kg/acre

Fe

350

430

140

920g/acre

Mn

223

263

82

568g/acre

Zn

111

146

40

297g/acre

B

103

194

43

340g/acre

Cu

40

54

13

107g/acre

Nutrient partitioning among plant organs, what percentage goes into roots trunk/cordon, shoots, leaves/petioles and reproductive organs/berries?

Thereis goodphysiological evidence that grapevinepartitioningchangesstronglywith growthstage. Inparticular,early growth dependssubstantially on stored root/perennial reserves; during flowering and berry development current root uptakebecomesdominant;andatharvestalargeproportionofseveralnutrientsisassociatedwith fruit,while N,Ca,Mg and micronutrients can remain strongly represented in vegetative organs.

TABLE 5—Foundation-pruningphase:PartitioningofNutrienttoorgans

Percentageofnutrientuptake allocatedtoorgans

Nutrient

Roots

%

Trunk

+

cordon

%

Shoots

/canes

%

Leaves

+

petioles

%

Inflorescence

/fruit

%

Total

N(kg)

5.04

12

5.04

12

13.44

32

17.64

42

0.84

2

42

P(kg)

1.08

15

1.08

15

2.16

30

2.66

37

0.22

3

7.2

K(kg)

3.8

10

3.8

10

13.3

35

15.96

42

1.14

3

38

Ca(kg)

3.78

12

6.3

20

9.45

30

11.34

36

0.63

2

31.5

Mg(kg)

0.91

12

0.91

12

2.28

30

3.27

43

0.23

3

7.6

S(kg)

0.73

12

0.73

12

1.95

32

2.56

42

0.12

2

6.1

Fe(g)

63

18

53

15

88

25

140

40

7

2

350

Mn(g)

27

12

27

12

62

28

103

46

4

2

223

Zn(g)

17

15

17

15

31

28

44

40

2

2

111

B(g)

10

10

15

15

29

28

45

44

3

3

103

Cu(g)

18

18

25

37

2

Atthisstagethereisessentiallynomarketablefruitsink.Nutrientsarepredominantlygoingintonewshoots, leaves/petioles and replenishment of perennial structures.

Whatthistellsus

Duringfoundationpruning,thedominantnutrientsinkis:

Leaves/petioles→shoots→perennialwood→roots→reproductivestructures

Thisisparticularly important forN,Mg,Mn,Znand B,wherethedevelopingcanopy representsavery largesink.

TABLE6—Fruit-pruningphasePartitioningofNutrienttoorgans:

Percentageofnutrientuptake allocatedtoorgans

Nutrient

Roots

%

Trunk

+

cordon

%

Shoots

/canes

%

Leaves

+

petioles

%

Berries + reproductive organs

%

Total

N(kg)

7.25

10

5.8

8

15.95

22

18.13

25

25.38

35

72.5

P(kg)

0.97

8

0.85

7

2.18

18

2.66

22

5.45

45

12.1

K(kg)

4.62

6

3.85

5

11.55

15

14.63

19

42.35

55

77

Ca(kg)

4.8

12

5.6

14

8.8

22

10

25

10.8

27

40

Mg(kg)

0.78

8

0.69

7

1.76

18

2.45

25

4.12

42

9.8

S(kg)

0.74

8

0.64

7

1.66

18

2.3

25

3.86

42

9.2

Fe(g)

77

18

52

12

99

23

125

29

77

18

430

Thisiswherethepartitioningchangesdramaticallybecauseberriesbecomeamajorsink.

TheimportantpointisKFruit-pruningperiodasthemajorK-partitioningperiod.

Krequirement≠issimplyNOT"Krequiredto produce15tonnesofgrapes."

Thevinefirst needsKfor:

•leafexpansion,

•shoottransport,

•stomatalregulation,

•phloemloading,

•berrygrowth,

•sugartransportandaccumulation,

•osmoticregulation.

Kis strongly associatedwiththefruit-productionsink.

Forevery1kgofKtakenupduringthisphase,approximately:

•0.06kg→roots

•0.05kg→perennial wood

•0.15kg→shoots

•0.19kg→leaves

•0.55kg→reproductiveorgans/berries

ForB,thereproductivesinkisalsoparticularly strong:

~43%ofBuptake→berries/reproductiveorgans.

ThatisonereasonBnutritionbecomesparticularlyimportantaroundflowering→fruitset→earlyberry development

Table7—post-harvestrecoveryPartitioningofNutrienttoorgans:

Percentageofnutrientuptake allocatedtoorgans

Nutrient

Roots

%

Trunk

+

cordon

%

Shoots

/canes

%

Leaves

/ petioles

%

Remaining reproductive organs

%

Total

N(kg)

4.25

25

4.25

25

3.4

20

4.76

28

0.3

2

17

P(kg)

0.75

25

0.84

28

0.6

20

0.75

25

0.1

2

3

K(kg)

2.44

20

3.42

28

2.68

22

3.42

28

0.2

2

12.2

Ca(kg)

3.64

18

7.07

35

4.44

22

4.85

24

0.2

1

20.2

Mg(kg)

0.92

23

1.08

27

0.88

22

1.08

27

0.0

1

4

S(kg)

0.58

23

0.63

25

0.55

22

0.73

29

0.0

1

2.5

Fe(g)

35

25

42

30

25

18

36

26

1.0

1

140

Mn(g)

16

20

23

28

16

20

25

31

1.0

1

81

Zn(g)

10

25

11

28

8

20

11

28

0.4

1

40

B(g)

9

21

13

30

9

21

12

28

0.4

1

43

Cu(g)

3.3

25

4.2

32

2.3

18

3.1

24

0.1

1

13

This phaseis particularlyimportantin Maharashtrabecausethevinehasto recover its nutrient reserves before the next cycle.

Herethe root+trunk+cordon +surviving leaves becomemuch moreimportant,becausethevineisrebuilding its reserve pools. This is the reserve-building phase for use in the next growth cycle.

TableItoVshowSeasonaluptake&AssimilationofPlantnutrientsinvariousorgans

TableITableIITableIII

Nutrient

foundation

Fruit pruning

Post-harvest

Total

foundation

Fruit pruning

Post-harvest

Total

foundation

Fruit pruning

Post-harvest

Total

Roots

0

Trunk+cordon

Shoots/canes

N(kg)

5.04

7.25

4.25

16.54

5.04

5.8

4.25

15.09

13.44

15.95

3.4

32.79

P (kg)

1.08

0.97

0.75

2.8

1.08

0.85

0.84

2.77

2.16

2.18

0.6

4.94

K(kg)

3.8

4.62

2.44

10.86

3.8

3.85

3.42

11.07

13.3

11.55

2.68

27.53

Ca(kg)

3.78

4.8

3.64

12.22

6.3

5.6

7.07

18.97

9.45

8.8

4.44

22.69

Mg(kg)

0.91

0.78

0.92

2.61

0.91

0.69

1.08

2.68

2.28

1.76

0.88

4.92

S(kg)

0.73

0.74

0.58

2.05

0.73

0.64

0.63

2

1.95

1.66

0.55

4.16

Fe(g)

63

77

35

175

53

52

42

147

88

99

25

212

Mn(g)

27

37

16

80

27

26

23

76

62

53

16

131

Zn(g)

17

18

10

45

17

13

11

41

31

28

8

67

B(g)

10

16

9

35

15

14

13

42

29

33

9

71

Cu(g)

7

8

3.3

18.3

7

6

4.2

17.2

10

11

2.3

23.3

139.34

175.16

85.88

400.38

136.86

128.43

110.49

375.78

262.58

265.9

72.85

601.33

TableIVTableV

Nutrient

foundation

Fruit pruning

Post-harvest

Total

foundation

Fruit pruning

Post-harvest

Total

Leaves+petioles

Inflorescence

/fruit

Berries+

reproductive organs

Remaining

reproductive organs

N(kg)

17.64

18.13

4.76

40.53

0.84

25.38

0.34

26.56

P (kg)

2.66

2.66

0.75

6.07

0.22

5.45

0.06

5.73

K(kg)

15.96

14.63

3.42

34.01

1.14

42.35

0.24

43.73

Ca(kg)

11.34

10

4.85

26.19

0.63

10.8

0.2

11.63

Mg(kg)

3.27

2.45

1.08

6.8

0.23

4.12

0.04

4.39

S(kg)

2.56

2.3

0.73

5.59

0.12

3.86

0.03

4.01

Fe(g)

140

125

36

301

7

77

1

85

Mn(g)

103

82

25

210

4

66

1

71

Zn(g)

44

41

11

96

2

47

0.4

49.4

B(g)

45

49

12

106

3

83

0.4

86.4

Cu(g)

15

16

3.1

34.1

1

12

0.1

13.1

400.43

363.17

102.69

866.29

20.18

376.96

3.81

400.95

Table8:completeannualorganbudget:Totalannualnutrientaccumulationbyorgan

Nutrient

Roots

%

Trunk+ cordon

%

Shoots

/canes

%

Leaves+ petioles

%

Inflorescence

/fruit

%

Total

%

N(kg)

16.54

12.58

15.09

11.47

32.79

24.93

40.53

30.82

26.56

20.20

131.51

100.00

P(kg)

2.80

12.55

2.77

12.42

4.94

22.14

6.07

27.21

5.73

25.68

22.31

100.00

K(kg)

10.86

8.54

11.07

8.70

27.53

21.64

34.01

26.74

43.73

34.38

127.20

100.00

Ca(kg)

12.22

13.33

18.97

20.69

22.69

24.74

26.19

28.56

11.63

12.68

91.70

100.00

Mg(kg)

2.61

12.20

2.68

12.52

4.92

22.99

6.80

31.78

4.39

20.51

21.40

100.00

S(kg)

2.05

11.51

2.00

11.23

4.16

23.36

5.59

31.39

4.01

22.52

17.81

100.00

Fe(g)

175.00

19.02

147.00

15.98

212.00

23.04

301.00

32.72

85.00

9.24

920.00

100.00

Mn(g)

80.00

14.08

76.00

13.38

131.00

23.06

210.00

36.97

71.00

12.50

568.00

100.00

Zn(g)

45.00

15.08

41.00

13.74

67.00

22.45

96.00

32.17

49.40

16.55

298.40

100.00

B(g)

35.00

10.28

42.00

12.34

71.00

20.86

106.00

31.14

86.40

25.38

340.40

100.00

Cu(g)

18.30

17.26

17.20

16.23

23.30

21.98

34.10

32.17

13.10

12.36

106.00

100.00

Highest

Second

Third

 

ColourCode

Thepicturebecomesquiteclear

For a 15-t/acre crop, the annual nutrient budget is approximately: Leaves/petioles arethelargest annualnutrient reservoir for most nutrients.

Shoots/canesarethesecond major vegetativereservoir. Important definition

•Harvestedgrapes=nutrientphysicallyleavingthevineyardinthe15t/acrecrop.

•Pruningmaterial=nutrientleavingthevineyardifprunedcanes/shootsareremovedfromthevineyard.

•Leaf-fall/pruningresiduereturned=nutrientscontainedinleaves/petiolesandanyshreddedpruningmaterialthatis returned/compostedin the vineyard.

•Permanentvinestructure=roots+trunk+cordonsandnutrientretainedthereattheendoftheannualcycle.

Table9:Nutrientpermanentlyremovedinharvestedgrapes

Nutrient

Nutrientin

harvested crop

Nutrient

Nutrientin

harvested crop

N

26.6kg/acre

Fe

85g/acre

P

5.73kg/acre

Mn

71g/acre

K

43.73kg/acre

Zn

49g/acre

Ca

11.63kg/acre

B

86g/acre

Mg

4.39kg/acre

Cu

13g/acre

S

4.01kg/acre

Table10:Nutrientremovedinpruningmaterial

Here we have todistinguish biomass pruned out frombiomass that remainsaspermanent structure.Ifthese canes are physically removed from the vineyard, that becomes a nutrient export.

Nutrient

Removed in shoots/canes

Nutrient

Removed in shoots/canes

N

32.8kg/acre

Fe

212g/acre

P

4.94kg/acre

Mn

131g/acre

K

27.5kg/acre

Zn

67g/acre

Ca

22.7kg/acre

B

71g/acre

Mg

4.92kg/acre

Cu

23g/acre

S

4.16kg/acre

ButthisisNOTnecessarilyavineyardnutrientloss.

Ifthegrower:prunes → shreds → decomposes/composts → returns to vineyard then mostofthisbecomesa recycling pool, not permanent removal.

Table11:Nutrientreturnedthroughleaffall+residues

wecannotsimplysaythat100% ofthesequantitiesarereturnedto soil.

Beforeleaffall, grapevinesremobilisesubstantialamounts ofmobile nutrientsfromleavesintoperennialorgans.N,P, K and B are particularly mobile; Ca and Mg are much less mobile.

Thefollowingisworkingrecyclingestimate:

Nutrient

Leaf/residue pool

Approx. potentially recycledin %

Returned to soil working estimate

Nutrient

Leaf / residue pool

Approx. potentially recycled

Returned to soil working estimate

N

40.5

50

20.25

Fe

301

88

264.88

P

6.07

70

4.249

Mn

210

80

168

K

34

80

27.2

Zn

96

70

67.2

Ca

26.2

88

23.056

B

106

60

63.6

Mg

6.8

80

5.44

Cu

34

80

27.2

S

5.59

60

3.354

Table12:Nutrientretainedinpermanentvinestructure

Thisisnotanannualloss.Itisanutrientreservoir.Thisincludes:roots+trunk+cordons

Nutrient

Roots

Trunk

+

cordon

Totalin

Permanent structure

Nutrient

Roots

Trunk

+

cordon

Totalin

Permanent structure

N

16.54

15.09

31.63kg

Fe

175

147

322g

P

2.8

2.77

5.57kg

Mn

80

76

156g

K

10.86

11.07

21.93kg

Zn

45

41

86g

Ca

12.22

18.97

31.19kg

B

35

42

77g

Mg

2.61

2.68

5.29kg

Cu

18

17

35g

S

2.05

2

4.05kg

For example,stored Nand carbohydrate in roots,trunk and canesare mobilised early in the next growth cycle. ResearchusinglabelledNhasdemonstratedthisreservemobilisation aroundbudbreakandearlydevelopment.

Table13:Thecomplete15-Ton/acrenutrientbalance

Puttingthefourcategoriestogethergivesusamuchmoreusefulpicture:

Nutrient

Harvested Grapes

Pruning material

Leaf/residue pool

Permanent vine

Annual uptake in Kg

Nutrient

Harvested grapes in g

Pruning material in g

Leaf/residue in g

Permanent vine in g

Annual uptake in g

N

26.6

32.8

20.25

31.6

131.5

Fe

85

212

264.88

322

920

P

5.73

4.94

4.249

5.57

22.3

Mn

71

131

168

156

568

K

43.7

27.5

27.2

21.9

127.2

Zn

49

67

67.2

86

298

Ca

11.6

22.7

23.056

31.2

91.7

B

86

71

63.6

77

340

Mg

4.39

4.92

5.44

5.29

21.4

Cu

13

23

27.2

35

105

S

4.01

4.16

3.354

4.05

17.8

Share: WhatsApp Facebook X
Ravindra Thatte

About the author

Ravindra Thatte

Owner & Director, Eco Agro Services

Over 35 years in marketing high-quality agricultural inputs — chelated micronutrients, biostimulants and plant growth promoters.

View profile & all articles →

Need advice for your crop?

Talk to the Eco Agro team about nutrition programmes, soil health and fertigation for your farm.